Articles from my previous blog

The Tomb of Henry de Lacy lost in the Great Fire of London

It had been a long, hot summer in 1666 and the city of London was crowded with overhanging wooden buildings that were tinder dry.  Legend suggests that someone was a little careless in a bakery on Pudding Lane, although the baker swore in court that his fires had all been put out that night.  At the time blame was laid on French or Dutch conspirators and it was also suggested that it was a Papist plot.  Titus Oates blamed Jesuit priests for setting fire to the city.  And after an investigation into the cause of the fire a French Protestant watchmaker, Robert Hubert, confessed to having deliberately started it and was hanged at Tyburn.

But other people accepted that it was an ‘act of God’.   There was a strong east wind and the fire spread.  It burned for several days and at its worst it reached St Paul’s Cathedral where wooden scaffolding caught fire followed by the timber roof beams.  The lead of the roof melted and flowed down Ludgate Hill.  Stones exploded from the building and within a few hours the Cathedral was a ruin.

Within the Cathedral, was the body and tomb of Henry de Lacy, earl of Lincoln, who died on 5th February 1311.  Henry de Lacy was buried in St Dunstan’s Chapel in St Paul’s.  His monument was described as ‘an elaborately ornamented altar tomb on which was a recumbent armed effigy of the earl, with hands placed in the attitude of prayer, a lion at the feet, and angels supporting a pillow for the head’.

Luckily a drawing had been made of the tomb in 1656 by artist Wenceslaus Hollar:

Sir James Harrington and the battle of Bosworth

August 22, 2011 by elizabethashworth | Edit

Today (22nd August) is the anniversary of the Battle of Bosworth.  In case you don’t know it was the battle at which King Richard III was defeated by Henry Tudor.  I’m not going to go into all the complex details of the reasons for this battle as it would probably take me years.  If you are interested you can take a look at:  http://www.bosworthbattlefield.com

There is information there about the recent rediscovery of the actual site of the battle which is a short distance from the visitor centre.  It was here, in September 2009, that a small gilded silver boar badge was discovered which was almost certainly worn by a knight in Richard’s retinue – one of those brave men who accompanied him in his fatal charge to defeat Henry Tudor.

One of those men was Sir James Harrington and the badge may have been his. His father Sir Thomas Harrington and his eldest brother John had both died at the battle of Wakefield in 1460, fighting for the Yorkist cause.   Tragic though that was it was timings of their deaths that caused a huge problem for the remaining Harrington family.  Because Thomas died at the battle and John died from his wounds later the Harrington estates, which included the strategically placed Hornby Castle in north Lancashire passed from father to son and then to John’s heirs.  John Harrington’s heirs were his two young daughters – Anne and Elizabeth – who were aged around four and five years old at this time.  As they were not old enough to inherit they were taken into the care of the king, Edward IV, and their wardship was given to Sir Thomas Stanley who was quick to arrange marriages for them with one of his sons and a nephew.  What this meant was that Hornby Castle now belonged to the Stanleys and the Harrington family were virtually dispossessed.

But James Harrington and his younger brother Robert refused to give up the castle.  Thomas Stanley was infuriated and brought up a cannon to persuade them otherwise.  At this time, Richard was duke of Gloucester and aged around seventeen years old.  He could see the unfairness of what had happened and, after failing to persuade his brother, the king, that the arrangements should be changed he rode to Hornby to help the Harringtons defend it against Stanley.  This was the beginning of the emnity between Richard and Thomas Stanley which resulted in Stanley deserting him for the cause of his stepson, Henry Tudor, at Bosworth.

In 1465, James Harrington was one of the men who captured Henry VI who had been hiding out in Lancashire.  He was delivered to Edward IV who kept him captive in the Tower of London.  I think that James Harrington may have hoped that this act of loyalty would make Edward look more favourably at his claim to Hornby, but although James was rewarded the castle was not returned to him.

Later, after the defeat of the earl of Warwick, both James and Robert Harrington were later taken into Richard’s household and were amongst the select group of his personal retainers.  They would have both worn a small silver gilt boar badge to show their status and their loyalty to Richard.

When he became king, Richard  expressed his intention of re-opening the debate about the ownership of Hornby Castle.  He was still determined that it should be returned to James Harrington.  Of course, the idea infuriated Thomas Stanley.  His son Edward was married to Anne Harrington and was living at Hornby and was not prepared to hand it back.

So, on the morning of the 22nd August, 1485, when Richard rode into battle with the Harrington brothers at his side, Thomas Stanley decided to fight against them.  Richard was killed.  James Harrington escaped with his life and fled, possibly losing his badge in the mud of Bosworth Field to be found over 500 years later.

Some of you may already know that I’ve written a novel about this story.  It’s provisionally titled By Loyalty Bound and is still awaiting publication.  I hope that I can share this story with you soon.  Not only does it suggest that Richard’s support of the Harrington family was a factor in the Stanleys’ decision not to fight for him at Bosworth, it also introduces the intriguing idea that Anne Harrington could have been the mother of his children John and Katherine.

Could this be Alice de Lacy?

August 19, 2011 by elizabethashworth | Edit

When I visited Lincolnshire earlier in the year I went to see the church of St Michael at Swaton.

Having been warned that the church is kept locked and that a key holder needs to be located I approached the small village with trepidation.  Friends had told tales of not being able to gain access and having to stand on upturned flower pots to peer in through the windows, but I managed to obtain the huge key from a lovely lady at the tearooms just down the road and having turned the locks – top and bottom – on the old wooden church door I stepped inside.

St Michael’s dates back to the Normans.  William the Conqueror gave Swaton to Wido de Credon, a King’s thane and it is thought that a church was built here soon afterwards.  There was rebuilding in 1230, but it is the extensive alterations that were undertaken in 1320 that interest me most as the church was, at this time, in the possession of Alice de Lacy.

At the back of the church is an effigy of a lady.

The information leaflet in the church says: “The effigy of a lady with a sleeping dog at her feet is dressed in 13th century costume and is therefore older than the nave.  It may commemorate the wife of Gerard de Camville, Lord of the manor of Swaton in the first quarter of the 13th century.”

The wife of Gerard de Camville was Nicholaa de la Haye.  She was the daughter of Richard de la Haye and Matilda de Verdun who had been given Swaton as a dowry by Henry II after it had passed back into royal possession.  Nicolaa was the hereditary custodian of Lincoln Castle and after her husband’s death she became the constable in her own right and held the castle against a siege for King John.  She was buried at Swaton Church so it seems reasonable to assume that the effigy is hers.  But experts claim that the style of the effigy is from a later date.

It shows a lady whose head is resting on a double cushion and up until around 1300 it was usual to have only a single cushion.  Her feet rest upon a dog, which looks a little like a spaniel, and up until the beginning of the 14th century it was more usual for the feet to rest on a lion.   The style of dress, with the tightly buttoned sleeves, which can be clearly seen, would also date the effigy to the early 1300s.

It has been suggested that the effigy could be that of Nicolaa’s granddaughter, Idonea de Camville who married William Longspee (2), or her great granddaughter, Ela (or Emma) Longspee.

Amongst the entries relating to Alice de Lacy’s lands after the execution of her husband in 1322 is one dated 10th July at York.  It reads:

Grant to Alice de Lascy, countess of Lincoln and Salisbury, late the wife
of Thomas, earl of Lancaster, and her heirs, that she may enter upon and
hold the manor of Avington, co. Berks, upon the death of Emma de
Lungespeye, who holds it for life of the inheritance of the said Alice, and
which upon the death of the said Emma ought for certain causes to pass
into the king's hands. By K.

This Emma de Lungespeye was a cousin of Alice's mother.  She would have been an elderly lady by this time and had no children so it is possible that when she died, possibly in 1331, her body was buried in her family's church and Alice commissioned an effigy.

Or could the effigy be Alice herself?  She was buried at Barlings Abbey in 1348.  It isn’t known whether there was an effigy on her tomb there or who might have commissioned it although it was not unheard of for effigies to be commissioned by people in their own lifetimes.  It is an outside possibility that Alice had the effigy carved during her lifetime and that it was intended for her own tomb.  Perhaps it was rescued from the abbey church at the Dissolution and brought back to Swaton from Barlings?  It seems unlikely.

It is also unlikely that the effigy is of Alice’s mother Margaret Longspee (de Lacy).  She was buried at Lacock Abbey which was founded by her ancestor Ela Longspee and although her tomb may have born an effigy it is very unlikely that this is it.

Perhaps Alice commissioned an effigy of her ancestor Nicolaa de la Haye to be placed in the newly refurbished church to mark the site of her burial.  That would explain the discrepancy between the date of Nicolaa’s death and the date of the carving.

I don’t think the identity of the lady can ever be certain but I’m sure there must be some link with Alice de Lacy.  After her husband, Thomas, earl of Lancaster, was executed as a traitor in 1322 most of her lands were confiscated, including the ones that she held by right through her mother’s family, but she asked for permission to grant the church at Swaton to Barlings Abbey:

dated at York, 16 July, 16 Edward II, by Alice de Lacy, countess of Lincoln and Salisbury,to the abbot and convent of St. Mary’s, Barlinges, of the manor of Swaveton, co. Lincoln, and the advowson of the church thereof, with knights’ fees, homages and services of free tenants, free fair, free market, and free warren, for the good of the souls of Edward I and Eleanor his wife, Henry de Lacy, sometime earl of Lincoln, and Margaret his wife, her father and mother, Edmund her brother, her ancestors and heirs. 

It seems that the church of St Michael was a special to Alice as a place that had been in the possession of her mother’s family for generations.  I enjoyed seeing it for myself and if you’re in the area do take the trouble to locate a keyholder and go to look inside.  It’s well worth seeing and you will also find the remains of a medieval wall painting of the wheel of fortune – fortune that was not always kind to Alice de Lacy.

Ordsall Hall

June 2, 2011 by elizabethashworth | Edit

Today I went to visit Ordsall Hall in Salford on the outskirts of Manchester.  £6.5 has recently been spent restoring the building and grounds and compared to my last visit, before the work was done, it is impressive and there is so much more to see from the well deep below the kitchen to the roof timbers in the attic.  And don’t be put off by the car park charge, entry to the hall is free.

Much has changed since the first house was built here in 1251 when it was a country estate surrounded by farm buildings and 80 acres of arable land growing wheat and corn. The hall is now surrounded by the suburbs of Manchester and  you can see modern buildings, including the sky scraping Beetham Tower, not far away.

The buildings to the left show how near the hall is to modern housing.

Ordsall is first mentioned in 1177 and there was probably a house here by 1251 when William de Ferrers, earl of Derby, exchanged the manor with David de Hulton for land in Pendleton.

Ordsall Hall is best know as the home of the Radclyffe family.  The manor was bequeathed to Sir John Radclyffe in 1335 by the childless Richard de Hulton.  By 1380 Sir John had created a building with a hall, five chambers, a kitchen and a chapel.  The estate included three farms, two shippons, a granary, a dovecote and a windmill as well as the arable land and six acres of meadow.  Sir John fought in France with Edward III and was granted the right to use the motto ‘Caen, Crecy, Calais’.

The family has a long and fascinating history and took part in the Hundred Years War, the Wars of the Roses and the English Civil War.

One of the stories told at the hall is that of the tragic Lady Margaret Radclyffe who lived from 1575 to 1599.  After her twin brother Alexander was killed fighting in Ireland, she died, heartbroken, despite the personal care of Elizabeth I, whose lady she was.

The hall has a wealth of ghost stories and sightings of the White Lady could be Lady Margaret as she waits for her brother to come home.

 The ghost here is created by modern technology, but the hall is an atmospheric place, especially the Star Chamber, which is one of the surviving rooms from the original hall.  I’m normally quite skeptical about ghosts, but on both visits to this room I’ve stood in a particular spot near the fireplace and had a very strange feeling of apprehension and grief.  I also captured an extraordinary number of ‘orbs’ on my photos.  Perhaps it was all those spotlights.  Or maybe something else?

If you want to check on ghostly activity yourself you can log on to the ghostcam at: http://services.salford.gov.uk/ghostcam/

Upstairs in the Great Chamber, set out to represent the bedchamber of Alice Radclyffe in 1510, you can see paintings on the roof beams that are thought to date from around 1360.

   The image below is a modern recreation of the original.  It depicts a pomegranate – a symbol of unity and fertility which often appeared in private bed chambers.

Down in the kitchen the well has been uncovered.  The last time I was there I was given a pair of dousing rods and although I didn’t believe anything would happen they almost flew out of my hands  - and now I can see that there really is a well at that exact spot!

Another area now open to the public is the roofspace where you can clearly see the wattle and daub construction of the earliest parts of the hall.

It was also refreshing to see the outer woodwork cleaned of its black paint.  Tudor buildings never were black and white and the current colours are not only authentic but much more pleasing to the eye.

And if you do visit, look up before you go in the main door and you’ll see an eagle’s claw, the emblem of the Stanley family.  In 1430, Agnes Harrington who was a cousin of Thomas, Lord Stanley, married Alexander Radclyffe, thus linking the two families.  The Stanleys were hugely influential in west Lancashire and were responsible for the defeat of Richard III at Bosworth – but that’s a story for another day.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

May 28, 2011 by elizabethashworth | Edit

During my exploration of Lincolnshire I visited Holy Trinity church at Tattershall.

Having received a charter from Henry VI to demolish the old Norman church of St Peter and St Paul, Ralph, 3rd Baron Cromwell, began his new church in  1439.   It was not until 1500 that it was completed and the intervening years saw the power struggle between the Yorkist and Lancastrian kings that is known as the Wars of the Roses.

In August 1453 a wedding took place in the church between Maud, the niece and co-heiress of Lord Cromwell, and Sir Thomas Neville.  There is an interesting short essay displayed in the church that explains some of the significance of this marriage. Rather than repeat it all, I’ve added my photo of it below.  Click to enlarge:

If you don’t want to read it all, or can’t make the text large enough it basically explains that this marriage led to bad feeling between the Nevilles and the Percys of Northumberland to the extent that there was a pitched battle at Heworth Moor in Yorkshire as Thomas Neville took his new bride home.  The troubles, as was common in the middle ages, centred around land and in particular the manors of Wressle and Burwell which had once belonged to the Percys, but had been given to Lord Cromwell by Henry VI.  It then goes on to explain a little about the roles of these families in the Wars of the Roses.

Another interesting feature of the church is the tiny grave of ‘Tom Thumb’ a local resident who died in 1620.  It is lovingly marked with flowers and a short poem in his honour.

The church also has a small tea room at the back of the nave, where drinks and home made cakes are served and is worth a visit for that alone.

Ralph, 3rd Baron Cromwell, also demolished his ancestors nearby stone castle to make way for a new brick built one which was also constructed during the 1440s.  The whole area must have been one vast building site during those years.  But as Lord Treasurer to Henry VI he certainly had the resources to show off his wealth and status.

I didn’t have time to go inside the castle on this visit so I’m hoping to go again sometime when I have more time and I’m able to climb all those steps!  Meanwhile there’s a short history of the building here:  http://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/main/w-vh/w-visits/w-findaplace/w-tattershallcastle/w-tattershallcastle-brief_history.htm

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

Barlings Abbey

May 22, 2011 by elizabethashworth | Edit

The remains of Barlings Abbey lie at Low Barlings about seven miles from Lincoln.  The abbey was built around 1154 by monks (known as canons) of the Premonstratensian order, on land given to them by Ralf de Haya.  It’s thought that they first settled on higher ground at Barlings Grange, but then moved to this site known as Oxeney – the island where the oxen graze.

The canons built a causeway of about half a mile to cross the fen and link the abbey  to higher ground and it still forms the foundation of the narrow lane which twists through the fields to the site of the remains.

The land is privately owned but access is allowed. Follow the footpath through the gate and you will see the remains of one side of the nave rising to the skyline. All around you will see grass covered mounds where other stonework peeps out from under the grass, giving clues to the once magnificent abbey church that stood here.

Not far from here Alice de Lacy is buried alongside her second husband Eble le Strange. Alice’s links with the abbey go back to its foundation.  She is a descendant of Ralph de Haya through her mother Margaret.  Both Alice and her mother are also descended from Nicola de la Haye, famously known as a constable of Lincoln Castle who defended it against a siege in the reign of King John.  Nicola is buried at the church of St Michael at Swaton and when Alice’s lands were forcibly taken from her after the execution of her first husband Thomas, earl of Lancaster, she pleaded to be allowed to endow the manor and church of Swaton to Barlings Abbey for prayers for her soul and the souls of her parents and ancestors.

When her second husband, Eble le Strange, died in Scotland in 1335, his body was brought home and buried at Barlings Abbey.  On her death in 1348, Alice asked to be buried beside him.  (Although she had taken a vow of chastity after his death she was later abducted and forced into a third marriage, but she wished to spend eternity beside Eble.)

Here is a detail of some of the carving on the remains:

Agriculture, and particularly wool production, made Barlings Abbey one of the richest and most influential of the Premonstratensian houses in England.

The canons wore a white habit and cap and were known as the white canons.   Unlike ordinary monks, they did not always stay within the cloisters of the abbey, but served as village priests and missionaries in the local community.   Edward III, lodged at Barlings on at least three occasions and his chaplain was a canon of Barlings and later its abbot.

The last abbot was Michael Mackarel.  At Henry VIII’s dissolution of the monasteries he was charged with treason after being accused of involvement with the Lincolnshire Rising.  He was imprisoned in Lincoln Castle and later taken to the Tower of London where he was hanged in March 1537.

You can read more about Barlings Abbey here: http://www.lincsheritage.org/community_heritage/guides_information/witham_abbeys/site.php?key=barlings_abbey

The house at Low Barlings, complete with holiday cottages, stable block, 7.7 acres of land and the site of the abbey is currently for sale. So if you have some spare cash and you’d like to own this historic site, it can be yours for £650,000. If I had that sort of money I might just be tempted.  http://www.primelocation.com/uk-property-for-sale/details/id/rbln6964301/ One of the photographs on the site is taken from the air and gives a different perspective of the abbey ruins.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

The hawthorn tree at the bottom of my garden has burst into blossom just in time for May Day:

On a Hawthorn Tree
“Oh! come to see me, when the soft warm May
Bids all my boughs their gay embroidery wear,
In my bright season’s transitory day,
While my young perfume loads the enamoured air.”

George W.F. Howard (Earl of Carlisle 1802-1864)

Below I’ve posted an article I wrote for The Lady magazine some years ago. Just to update it, I have seen redwings most winters in the tree – and the hawthorn continues to bring me good fortune and success.

Hawthorn

By

Elizabeth Ashworth

“Cast not a clout ‘til May is out” goes the old saying, though it is not the month of May, but rather the May Tree or Hawthorn to which it refers.
When I moved into the house where I live now it was December and I was unsure what the trees at the bottom of my garden were. But with the coming of Spring they blossomed into a frothy white mass and there was no mistaking the intense scent of the crataegus monogyna or common hawthorn.
The hawthorn is one of our most successful native trees. It colonises abandoned grassland and is known by many names including quickthorn, whitethorn as well as may. The tree is quick growing and long lived. It can grow to 30 feet high, but it is commonly used for hedging, its sharp thorns making it thick and impenetrable.
The white blossom which flowers in May and June marks the end of any cold weather and so it is safe to ‘cast a clout’, or put away your warm winter underwear, when it appears. The smell of the blossom is almost overpowering. Some say it smells of musk and has sexual connotations. Others think it has a slight scent of decomposition. Rural villagers in the middle ages thought that it held the smell of the Great Plague of London. The reason for its strong scent is probably that the flowers are fertilised mainly by carrion insects, who would normally lay their eggs in rotting flesh and the tree has acquired a whiff of that smell to attract them.
The leaves, flowers and berries, which are bright red and can be seen from September, can all be used as a medicinal herb. Hawthorn is used to treat heart problems and it has been medically proved that the berries do reduce high blood pressure.
When burned its wood gives the hottest of fires, but it is the mythology and legend which surrounds this tree that make it most interesting.
Because it flowers in the Spring it is associated with fertility. Hawthorn was traditionally gathered on May Day. When you read about medieval knights and ladies riding out “a-maying” on the first morning of May, the practice refers to the custom of gathering flowering boughs of hawthorn to decorate the halls and May Poles.
The seventeenth-century English poet Robert Herrick wrote:
“There’s not a budding boy or girl this day,
But is got up and gone to bring in May;”

Another old rhyme says:
“The fair maid who, the first of May,
Goes to the fields at break of day
And washes in dew from the hawthorn tree,
Will ever after handsome be.”

It was also an important part of the decoration for Spring weddings. Yet if you place it leaves under a pillow or scatter them around a bedroom it will enforce or maintain chastity and celibacy.
Hawthorn is associated with both good and bad luck. A branch of hawthorn over your door will ward off evil spirits. Hawthorn will also protect you from lightning and protect your house from damage by storms. But do not bring the flowers into the house or someone who lives there will die. But if it is worn, or carried, it will promote happiness in the troubled, sad or depressed. Fishermen should also carry some hawthorn to ensure a good catch.
It is commonly believed that Christ’s ‘crown of thorns’ was made from hawthorn. In the Middle Ages, Sir John Mandeville wrote:
“Then was our Lord ylad into a Gardyn…and there the Jews scorned him, and
maden him a Crowne of the Braunches of Albespyne, that is White Thorn,”
There is also a legend that hawthorn was brought to this country by Joseph of Arimathea. Weary from his travels he rested his staff in the ground, where it took root and blossomed as the ‘Glastonbury Thorn’. A church was built on the site and this hawthorn is reputed to have blossomed at Christmas time to celebrate Jesus’ birth. It is told that cuttings from the tree were distributed all over Britain and still flower at Christmas, although the present hawthorn trees at Glastonbury Abbey are thought to be from a cutting of the original, which was hacked down on the orders of Oliver Cromwell during the English Civil War.
At one time hawthorns were thought to be witches who had transformed themselves into trees. It was believed that witches danced and performed rites under the hawthorn and that they used the branches to make their broomsticks.
It is also associated with fairies, especially in Ireland. The hawthorn is sacred to fairies and is part of the fairy tree triad of oak, ash and thorn. Where all three trees grow together it is said that you may see fairies. But bad luck will follow if you dare to disturb a ‘fairy thorn’. In 1982, workers in the De Lorean car plant in Northern Ireland claimed that the business had so many problems because a ‘fairy thorn’ bush had been disturbed during the construction of the plant. Apparently this claim was taken so seriously that a new bush was planted, with all due ceremony.
I believe that my tree has brought good luck. It has certainly brought me a lot of pleasure. A pair of magpies nest safely amongst the thorns and many other small birds use it for cover, to eat from a birdfeeder hanging from one of its lower branches. In the autumn, the red berries attract blackbirds and also provide food for visiting redwings and fieldfares, though I have never been lucky enough to see any. Neither have I seen any fairies. But I enjoy watching it change with the seasons and I have been happy and successful since I came here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

The primrose or prima rosa is the first rose of the year. It is also known as a primula and has about 1000 varieties. The best known is the common primrose, the bright yellow flower that not only grows in our gardens, but can be found in woodlands, hedgerows and shady meadows. It grows up to 20 cms high and has oval tapering leaves which form a rosette. The solitary yellow flowers are borne on long hairy stalks and usually appear from February until May.

The primrose was supposedly the favourite flower of Benjamin Disraeli who was Prime Minister to Queen Victoria in 1868 and again from 1874 to 1880. Queen Victoria sent a wreath of primroses to Disraeli’s funeral saying that they were ‘his favourite flowers’. But it seems that she may have been referring to Prince Albert. However, in following years, on this day, people wore primroses in remembrance of Disraeli and the date became known as Primrose Day.

Disraeli is remembered for his reform of housing and working conditions, his purchase of a controlling interest in the Suez Canal and for being laughed at when he made his maiden speech to Parliament. In 1876 he created the title of ‘Empress of India’ for the Queen and she made him Earl of Beaconsfield in the same year. He was also a novelist and started to write in an attempt to pay off debts incurred by losses in stocks and shares. He is often remembered too for being born a Jew, although he converted to Christianity at the age of thirteen after his father had a row with the synagogue.

In 1883 a statue of Disraeli by Mario Raggi was unveiled in Parliament Square, London and in following years it was festooned on the anniversary of his death with primroses.

With the passage of time Primrose Day has fallen out of fashion, but it was once observed quite keenly. An entry in a diary by William Robert Richards of Martock for April 1895 reads: “Primrose Day was well observed here, a large number of people wearing the deceased statesman’s favourite flower.”

The following extract is from an old newspaper dated 1927.

“19th April 1927: The eldest daughter of the landlord of the Leather Bottle was married:

‘Primrose Wedding’ at Leverstock Green
Primroses and primrose colourings were features of a pretty wedding on Primrose Day (Tuesday) at Leverstock Green Parish Church when Miss Sibyl Seabrook, elder daughter of Mr and Mrs Seabrook of Leverstock Green was married to Mr Edmund Bradbury Barnes Perkins, eldest son of the late Mr Thomas and Mrs Perkins also of Leverstock Green. Yellow daffodils and primroses also figured largely in the floral decorations in the church, these remaining from the Eastertide Festival. Gazette 23rd April 1927.”

The artist James George Bingley who lived from 1841 to 1920 painted a watercolour called “Primrose Day”. Another painting, this time in oils, was by Ralph Todd and is entitled “Primrose Day 1885”. It shows a young girl in a blue dress and white apron with a basket of yellow primroses on her knee. Beside her on a table are more primroses and yellow primroses are displayed in a glass jar.


An American poet, Henry Cuyler Bunner, who lived from 1855 to 1896 wrote in his poem ‘Chakey Einstein’:

“And all England, so they say,
Yearly blooms on Primrose Day”

Perhaps it is the political associations that have caused it to decline in this country, but I think it would be nice to wear and display primroses on one special day, just because they are so beautiful and such a firm statement of springtime.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

I made the most of the warm sunny weather this week to replace some of the photos that I lost in ‘the great computer crash’.

Two of the places I visited have huge connections with the de Lacy family – Pontefract Castle built by Ilbert de Lacy and Whalley Abbey which was founded by Henry de Lacy.

When Henry de Lacy gave permission for the monks at Stanlaw Abbey to move to Whalley one of the stipulations he made was the remains of his father, grandfather and great grandfather should be brought with them and reburied in the new abbey church. Sadly there is no record of this happening, but I believe that it did as there is the remains of a large gravestone to the left of the altar in what would have been the chancel of the church that bears the de Lacy lion. You can see it on the first photo.

The second photo is one that I took at Pontefract Castle. It is very worn but I think I can make out the outline of the de Lacy lion there as well. What do you think? Can anyone else see it? Click on the pictures to enlarge them.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

I went to visit Skipton Castle yesterday. It was a dull day and annoyingly today is sunny, but here it is:

The castle has been on my mind since I read that Joan de Geneville, the wife of Roger Mortimer, was imprisoned there after his part in the rebellion against Edward II and his subsequent escape to France from his cell in the Tower of London.

Joan was a descendant of Walter de Lacy and brought Ludlow Castle to her marriage with Roger Mortimer. As the eldest daughter, all the family estates were settled on her and her two younger sisters, Beatrice and Maud, were placed in Aconbury Priory. But, after giving Roger twelve children, Joan found herself without protection when her husband fled abroad where he became the lover of Queen Isabella.

In his book The Greatest Traitor, Ian Mortimer writes: ‘In April 1324, Joan was taken from her lodging in Hampshire, where she had been under house arrest, and imprisoned in the royal castle of Skipton in Craven in Yorkshire. The men of her household were removed, although she was allowed to keep a damsel, an esquire, a laundress, a groom and a page; but she was permitted only one mark a day to keep and feed herself and them.’

With her husband abroad, an enemy of the king, and her children imprisoned or sent to convents, Joan would have walked up these steps to her imprisonment in the castle.

She would have spent time gazing from the narrow windows, looking out at the rising hills, and wondering if she would ever be free.

She may have had some needlework, but her four books of romances were amongst her many possessions that had been confiscated by the king.

There was no one to help her escape and I doubt she could have climbed up a chimney as her husband had done at the Tower.

Or risked dropping to the surrounding moat from the latrine.

She may have been allowed to pray in the chapel of St John the Evagenlist which was built here in the 13th century.

But she would not have seen the courtyard as it is today. This yew tree was planted by Lady Anne Clifford in 1659 to commemorate the repair of the castle after its damage during the Civil War when it withstood a three year siege against Oliver Cromwell’s parliamentarian forces.

Joan spent five years imprisoned here, only being released when her husband invaded England with Queen Isabella. Having imprisoned Edward II, Roger Mortimer put the fourteen year old prince on the throne as Edward III, but in reality governed the country himself.

What Joan and Roger said to one another is unrecorded. Roger did buy four books of romances and probably gave them to Joan as replacements for the ones she had lost, but they never lived together again. Joan lived at Ludlow Castle and Roger remained in the company of the queen. Joan is just one of the many woman who fell victim to the politics of those years.

As today is Valentine’s Day and red roses abound I thought I’d tell you about Lancashire’s red rose – the symbol of the county for hundreds of years.

The Lancashire rose is rosa gallica officinalis and is more commonly known as the Apothecary Rose. In 19th century France this rose was a common sight outside the apothecary’s workshop.

It is an ancient variety of rose which originated in Persia where it grew wild and it’s thought to have been brought to Europe by returning Crusaders during the 12th and 13th centuries. Edmund, first earl of Lancaster, who was also known as ‘crouchback’ probably because of the Crusader’s cross he wore, may well have brought the plant back to England when he decided to use it as his emblem.

It was grown by monks for its medicinal properties, being used to cure a diverse range of ailments from gout to stomach upsets, sore throats, skin rashes and eye problems. Ladies rubbed their skin with rose petals to banish wrinkles and it was later proven that roses contained essential oils, potassium and iron. The rosehips are packed with vitamin C – how many of you remember rosehip syrup on school semolina puddings?

The rose was also grown for its perfume. The highly fragrant petals were used in pot pourri to scent medieval chambers and this variety of rose is still used for fragrances and cosmetics.

Rosa gallica officinalis is a small shrub rose, growing to around 4 feet in height (just over a metre) with crimson petals and prominent yellow anthers. It is a vigorous plant and is easy to grow. It can be seen in the herbaceous border near the Shire Hall entrance to Lancaster Castle, at Pendle Heritage Gardens in Barrowford, near the Ashton Memorial in Williamson Park at Lancaster, and at Levens Hall.

In religious symbolism the deep red of the Lancashire rose was used to represent the blood of Christ and other martyrs. Its petals were dried and rolled into beads that were strung together to form a rosary.

The stylised image of the Lancashire rose has five petals each separated by a sepal. It is depicted with two petals at the top, although the white Yorkshire rose is the other way up with a single petal at the top. The Tudor rose is a combination of the two with a larger red rose to show the supremacy of the house of Lancaster over the house of York.

The Lancashire Rose

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Someone left a poor review of The de Lacy Inheritance on the Waterstone’s website complaining that the distances and travelling times in the story were confused. So, just in case anyone thought I’d simply made them up, I’ll share an extract from Dr T.D. Whitaker’s History of the Original Parish of Whalley, and Honor of Clitheroe (Volume IV, chapter III).

He says that the estates of the de Lacy family stretched from Pontefract in Yorkshire to the Trough of Bowland in Lancashire. He calculates that a journey from one side to the other, on horseback, would have taken at least three days. The first stage would have been from Pontefract to Rothwell. The second stage from Rothwell to Bradford, then over the moors to Luddenden, on to Cliviger and to their manor at Ightenhill (on the outskirts of what is now Burnley). The third stage would have taken them from here to the castle at Clitheroe.

He gives the distance travelled as around 90 miles, which would mean a distance of 30 miles a day, which at a speed of 3 miles an hour would have meant 10 hours in the saddle each day – so the journey would not have been leisurely. Neither would it have been possible to travel so far each day in winter, as the travelling would be restricted by the hours of daylight.

On Google maps a similar route from Pontefract to Bradford then over the moors from Keighley to Colne and on to Clitheroe via Burnley is 70 miles and would take two hours by car. But one feature I find useful when calculating medieval travelling times is the estimate of how long it would take the walk the route. This shows as 21 hours. So maybe three days, at seven hours a day, is not so far out after all. But given the hilliness of the route over the moors and the need to stop for food and some respite I think that it is probably too optimistic and that it’s more likely to have taken four or five days to cross the Pennine hills from Pontefract to Clitheroe.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

February 1, 2011 by elizabethashworth | Edit

The 2nd February marks the festival of Candlemas. For those in the USA it is also marks Groundhog Day – and there is a connection because both are related to the coming of spring. The date marks the half-way point between the shortest day of the year and the spring equinox.

Candlemas is also known as the Feast of the Purification of the Virgin Mary and it is on this day that Christians remember Mary taking baby Jesus to be presented in the temple. The story is recorded in Luke’s gospel (Luke 2:29-32) and features the Nunc Dimittis (also known as the Song of Simeon, an elderly man who saw the child and recognised him as the Messiah). Those of you who have read The de Lacy Inheritance will recognise it as the prayer that Richard made when he returned to his cell at Cliderhou.

Lord, now lettest thou thy servant depart in peace : according to thy word.
For mine eyes have seen : thy salvation,
Which thou hast prepared : before the face of all people;
To be a light to lighten the Gentiles : and to be the glory of thy people Israel.

This version is taken from the 1662 prayerbook.

Because Simeon prophesied that the baby would a ‘light to lighten the Gentiles” (Gentiles are non Jewish people) the feast came to be celebrated by the lighting of candles and it is from this tradition that the name ‘Candlemas’ comes.

By the eleventh century there was a custom of blessing, at Candlemas, all the candles that were to be used in the church during the coming year. Candles were lit and there was a procession around the church whilst the Nunc Dimittis was sung. And even though nowadays most churches have electric light (though I know some that haven’t including Stydd Chapel at Ribchester and Holy Trinity in York) candles are still an important symbol of Christian worship.

Snowdrops, the first flowers of the springtime are also known as Candlemas Bells. There is an old rhyme which says:

The snowdrop in purest array, first rears her head on Candlemas Day

And for those of you who still haven’t taken down your Christmas decorations Herrick writes:

Down with the Rosemary and Bayes
Down with the Mistletoe
Instead of Holly, now up-raise
The greener Box for show.

There is another traditional Candlemas rhyme which says:

As the light grows longer
The cold grows stronger
If Candlemas day be fair and bright
Winter will have another flight;
If Candlemas Day be clouds and rain
Winter be gone and will not come again.

You can see the link with Groundhog Day in that one, can’t you? I am hoping for sunshine though. Even if it means a few more weeks of winter I’m hoping to find some snowdrops to photograph.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

January 10, 2011 by elizabethashworth | Edit

Today is Plough Monday – the first Monday after the feast of the Epiphany (6th January). The origins of the day are not clear but one possibility is that it was the first day when the peasants returned to work after the Christmas holiday. Medieval peasants did not own land but were given an area of land to farm in return for working two or three days a week farming their lord’s land. During the twelve days of Christmas they were given a holiday from working their lord’s lands, but once Epiphany had passed the lord would want his land ploughed ready for the spring seed to be sown and so all his serfs would be obliged to turn up with their ploughs and do just that.

At this time it was usual for a light to kept burning in the local church before the image of a saint that was known as the plough light. This was probably a semi-Christian ritual to ensure a good harvest. The first practice of going around the village with a plough on this day and begging for money was to ensure that there was enough to pay to keep the plough light burning throughout the year. The Reformation put an end to plough lights, but the tradition continued although in a slightly different form. On the day before Plough Monday, sometimes called Plough Sunday, the ploughs were taken to the local church to be blessed. On the Monday the decorated ploughs were paraded through the streets by ploughmen dressed in their clean white shirts with the sleeves decorated by brightly coloured ribbons. They would call out for ‘a penny for the ploughboys!’ from the local landowners and to prevent themselves being recognised there began a tradition of the ploughboys blackening their faces. They were usually accompanied by an old woman – or a boy dressed up as an old woman – called the Bessy and there was often also a fool, dressed in skins complete with a tail whose job it was to collect the money. Anyone who refused to pay up would have a furrow ploughed outside their home. One record from 1597 tells of a court case in which ten men from the village of North Muskham in Nottinghamshire were ordered to turn back the furrow they had ploughed across the churchyard on ‘Plow Daie’!

The money was intended to be given to the poor, though from some accounts that did not always happen as the event became associated with rowdiness and drinking and damage to property. It become less popular as industry took the place of farming though it was still marked in many places and by the 19th century it had become associated with straw bears – men or boys clothed in a layer of straw who danced to encourage the crops to grow in the spring.

Although not widely celebrated today the tradition does live on and in some places has been revived as folk dancing event.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments »

One hundred years ago today, on the 21st December 1910, at ten to eight in the morning, a huge blast ripped apart Hulton Colliery at Westhoughton in Lancashire, known locally as the Pretoria Pit. Deep underground a roof in a tunnel fell in and set off a chain of events that culminated in the explosion of methane gas and coal dust. Local man, Brian Clare, recalls that his mother still had vivid memories of that morning. As she was getting washed in the kitchen ready to go to school, the force of the explosion blew her off her feet.

The pit employed 2500 men and boys from the local area and on this particular morning the day shift had just begun and 898 men and boys, some as young as only twelve years old, were working down the mine. News reports of the time say that some of the miners had complained about gas and hot air in the mine and the coroner’s report, prepared by Mr Redmayne, noted that a large fall of the roof ‘some twenty yards long at No.2 face of the North Plodder had not been completely removed’. There was also a mention of miners seeing sparks coming from the conveyor belt switch at the No.1 face of the North Plodder which suggests that it was defective. The final conclusion of the inquest was that the roof collapse had caused the build up of gas and that a faulty lamp had ignited it.

News of the disaster quickly spread and men, women and children ran to help, but there was little they could do as the dead and dying were brought to the surface. During the day 553 miners were rescued but there were only two survivors from the level where the explosion occurred and a total of 344 men and boys were killed.

The funerals began on Christmas Eve; there were even funerals on Christmas Day and the disaster is remembered by locals as ‘Black Christmas 1910’. What people must have gone through during that Christmas is unimaginable and the loss of so many men and boys must have shaped the way Westhoughton has developed over the last hundred years. One woman lost her husband and four sons, the youngest of whom was just twelve and had gone down the pit for the first time that day.

The Pretoria Pit Disaster was the third largest pit disaster in British history and the worst in Lancashire. The loss of life was the largest in any English coalmine.

A relief fund was set up for the families and dependants and a total of £145,000 was raised. The marble memorial which cost £200 has this inscription:

‘Sacred to the memory of 344 men and boys who lost their lives by an explosion at the Pretoria Pit of the Hulton Colliery Co. on the 21st December 1910, 24 of whom sleep under this monument, being unidentified at the time of burial. This monument is erected by public subscription as a token of sympathy with the widows and relatives of the victims, 171 of whom are buried in this cemetery, 45 in Wingates, 20 in Daisy Hill, 3 in the congregational churchyards, and the remainder in various burial grounds. “Be Ye Therefore Ready Also For The Son of Man Cometh At An Hour When Ye Think Not.” St Luke Xll .40’

It was visited by thousands of grieving people in the days after its erection and the anniversary of the disaster is still remembered in an annual ceremony when a wreath is laid. A memorial service was held on Sunday and a new statue has been unveiled in memory of all those who lost their lives.

http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/news/s/1400529_town_remembers_victims_of_pretoria_pit_mine_blast_disaster__100_years_on

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Reluctant Recluses

December 1, 2010 by elizabethashworth | Edit

Many of you will already know that Henry de Lacy gave land at Whalley for the Cistercian monks to build a new abbey because the site at Stanlaw had proved unsuitable and liable to flooding.

After Henry de Lacy’s death his lands passed to his son-in-law Thomas of Lancaster and after Thomas’s execution, for his rebellion against Edward II, to his younger brother Henry. In December 1360 Henry Duke of Lancaster gave land at Ramsgreave and Standen for the maintenance of a recluse or anchoress to live in a hermitage in the churchyard at Whalley.

The recluse was to have two servants to wait on her, and a monk attended by a server was to sing mass daily in the chapel of her inclosure, the abbey providing all necessaries. These ‘necessaries’ were a weekly provision of 17 conventual loaves and 7 others, 8 gallons of the best ale, also 3d. for the attendants; and yearly: 10 stockfish, a bushel of oatmeal, a bushel of rye, 2 gallons of oil for the lamps, a stone of tallow for candles, 6 loads of turf and 1 of faggots.

The duke and his successors were to nominate the recluses and in 1437 a widow by the name of Isold Heaton was nominated. But she seems to have been reluctant and, like others before her, she ran away, prompting this letter from the monks to the king:

To THE KTNG OWRE SOVEREIGN LORD, &c.

Be hit remembryd that the plase arid habitacion of the seid recluse is within place halowed, and nere to the gate of the seyd monastre, and that the weemen that have been attendyng and acquayntyd to the seyd recluse have recorse dailly into the seyd monastre, for the livere of brede, ale, kychin, and other thyngs for the sustentacyon of the seyd recluse accordyng to the composityon endentyd above rehersyd : the whyche is not accordyng (fitting) to be had withyn such religyous plases. And how that dyvers that been anchores and recluses in the seyd plase aforetyme, contrary to theyre own oth and professyon, have brokyn owte of the seyd plase, wherin they were reclusyd, and departyd therfrom wythout eny reconsilyatyon. And in especyal how that now Isold of Heton that was last recluysd in the seyd plase, at denomynatyon and preferment of owre Sovereign Lord and Kyng that nowe is, is broken owte of the seyd plase, and hath departyd therfrom contrary to her own oth and professyon, not willyng nor entendyng to be restoryd agayn, and so livyng at her own liberte by this two yere and more, like as she had never bin professyd. And that divers of the wymen that have been servants ther and attendyng to the recluses afortym have byn misgovernyd, and gotten with chyld withyn the seyd plase halowyd, to the grete displeasaunce of hurt and disclander of the abbeye aforeseyd, &c.

Please hyt your Highness of our espesyal grase to grant to your orators the abbat, &c.

The result was that the hermitage was abandoned and it was ordered that the endowment should be used to maintain two chantry priests to say mass daily for the soul of Duke Henry and for the king. It seems that some cottages were later built on the site, but demolished in the 1800s and apart from the hermitage being located in the east of the churchyard there’s no clear evidence of exactly where it was – perhaps somewhere near to the present primary school?

Hermits and anchorites living in or around churches were quite common in the middle ages. You can still see the remains of an anchorite’s cell in the church at Skipton:

The plaque here records that the cell would have been blocked up after the anchorite entered and that she would have remained there for the rest of her life. ‘A small window admitted food and light and gave a view of the church’s altar’. Not much chance of running away from there then!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Lancashire Day

November 27, 2010 by elizabethashworth | Edit

Today is 27th November. It is Lancashire Day and I went to Lancaster to hear the Lancashire Day proclamation read out on the steps of the Lancaster City Museum by the town crier.

Celebrating Lancashire Day is a fairly recent tradition. It was introduced a few years ago by the Friends of Real Lancashire http://www.forl.co.uk/index.html to promote the fact that although the traditional county of Lancashire has been divided into new regions for administrative purposes the ‘real’ county still exists and anyone who lives within its boundaries is entitled to call themselves a Lancastrian.

The 27th November was chosen as Lancashire Day because it was on this in 1295 that the first elected representatives from Lancashire were called to Westminster by King Edward I to attend what later became known as “The Model Parliament”.

Here is the proclamation:

TO: THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY AND COUNTY PALATINE OF LANCASTER, GREETINGS!

Know ye that this day, November 27th in the year of
our Lord Two Thousand and Ten, the 59th year of
the reign of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II,
Duke of Lancaster, is Lancashire Day.

Know ye also, and rejoice, that by virtue of Her
Majesty’s County Palatine of Lancaster, the citizens
of the Hundreds of Lonsdale, North and South of
the Sands, Amounderness, Leyland, Blackburn,
Salford and West Derby are forever entitled to style
themselves Lancastrians.

Throughout the County Palatine, from the Furness
Fells to the River Mersey, from the Irish Sea to the
Pennines, this day shall ever mark the peoples’ pleasure
in that excellent distinction – true Lancastrians, proud
of the Red Rose and loyal to our Sovereign Duke.

GOD BLESS LANCASHIRE AND GOD SAVE THE QUEEN, DUKE OF LANCASTER.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

November 22, 2010 by elizabethashworth | Edit

Robert Curthose. The name was vaguely familiar. During my ongoing research into the de Lacy family I read that they were his supporters so when I saw a book named Conqueror’s Son – Duke Robert Curthose, Thwarted King by Katherine Lack I bought it and read it with interest. This well researched book tells the story of Robert Curthose, the eldest son of William the Conqueror who was beaten to the English throne by not one, but both, of his wily younger brothers. And to give legitimacy to the claims of first William Rufus and then Henry I, the reputation of their brother was recorded by chroniclers as that of a lazy and incompetent man. But then the victors always record their own version of history, don’t they? And along with kings such as Edward II and Richard III, Robert Curthose appears to have been done an injustice.

As William the Conqueror lay dying in 1087, his second son William Rufus left him to his fate and sailed across the English Channel to have himself crowned king of England before his elder brother could do anything about it. Robert Curthose became Duke of Normandy and there were those who said that this division of his kingdom was what his father had planned, but if it had been pre-arranged why didn’t William Rufus wait until his father was dead and buried before leaving? I definitely smell a rat.

Having lost England, Robert Curthose was one of the leaders of the First Crusade to reclaim Jerusalem. This was a huge undertaking. Thousands of people went – men, women and children. Robert Curthose proved himself a skilled military leader and returned in triumph three years later with a beautiful young bride. Except that just before he got back his eldest brother William Rufus was mysteriously shot in a hunting accident. He died and Robert Curthose’s youngest brother Henry had himself crowned king of England the very next day. I smell another rat.

Robert Curthose did lead an invasion of England but was persuaded to come to an agreement with Henry. Robert returned to Normandy, but Henry wanted that as well and breaking his promise he invaded. He beat Robert in battle, took him prisoner and kept him captive in Cardiff Castle for the rest of his life.

The de Lacy family lost their lands during this time and only had them restored after Henry’s death. Although the book doesn’t mention the de Lacy family other sources put Robert de Lacy and his son Ilbert at the centre of these struggles, which make more sense to me now that I’ve read more about the history. It’s a story well worth telling and one that I plan to pursue in the future.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Those of you who have read my novel The de Lacy Inheritance will know that Richard FitzEustace travelled to the holy well at Clitheroe in search of a cure. This happened around 800 years ago, but what you may not realise is that pilgrimages to holy wells to seek healing is something which still takes place in modern times.

Although you may be familiar with shrines such as Lourdes or Walsingham you may not know about the holy well at the church of St Mary the Virgin in Thorton-on-Craven (not too far from Clitheroe).

It is an ancient site of worship and probably pre-dates Christianity. Many pagan springs were ‘Christianised’ and dedicated to saints as the religion spread across the country. This spring has been a focus of Christian worship since Saxon times. It was used for baptisms and was the site of the village ‘church’ perhaps even before there was a church building there. The stone church that you see today was built in the 12th century after the Norman conquest. The tower was added in 1510.

The octagonal building that encloses the spring was built by a former rector, Henry Richardson, in 1764 to protect the well. ‘That it might prove a benefit for the health and salvation of the community’.

The well, which is a Grade 2 listed building, was restored in 2005 and has become the focus for both private pilgrimages and more formal services.

The form of service associated with a holy well is called The Sprinkling. The pilgrim is given a sip of the water, the sign of the cross is made with the water on the pilgrim’s forehead and water is then poured into the pilgrim’s hands.

There is more information about The Sprinkling and the meanings of the old and new inscriptions on the church’s website:http://www.fifparish.com/home/bmt/holywell.html

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Temple Newsam House

October 28, 2010 by elizabethashworth | Edit

Temple Newsam House, near Leeds is Tudor-Jacobean. The earliest part dates from the 1500s when it was a four sided manor house built by Thomas Lord Darcy. Darcy was beheaded in 1537 for his part in the Pilgrimage of Grace – the revolt against Henry VIII’s closure of the monasteries. His properties were forfeit and Temple Newsam was given by Henry VIII to his niece, the Countess of Lennox. Her sons Henry Lord Darnley and Lord Charles Stuart were born and brought up here. Darnley went on to marry Mary, Queen of Scots and was subsequently murdered. Elizabeth I seized Temple Newsam, imprisoned the Countess of Lennox in the Tower of London, and the house became the property of the crown.

After nearly 80 years of neglect, Temple Newsam was bought by Sir Arthur Ingram in 1622. Having made a fortune in London, Sir Arthur moved his power base to his native Yorkshire where he built (or re-built) five properties. At Temple Newsam he demolished three sides of the old Tudor house, and re-built two new wings to north and south, uniting the whole in 1628 with the inscription that can be seen around the roof line in the courtyard:

ALL GLORY AND PRAISE BE GIVEN TO GOD THE FATHER THE SON AND THE HOLY GHOST ON HIGH PEACE ON EARTH GOOD WILL TOWARDS MEN HONOUR AND TRUE ALLEGIANCE TO OUR GRACIOUS KING LOVING AFFECTION AMONGST HIS SUBJECTS HEALTH AND PLENTY BE WITHIN THIS HOUSE

But it is the earliest history of the site which has an especial interest for me. The manor of Newsam is recorded in the Domesday Book as belonging to Ilbert de Lacy. In 1155 land at Newsam, Skelton, Colton and Whitkirk was given to the Knights Templars by Henry de Lacy “for the salvation of my soul” and a preceptory was built at what was from then on called Temple Newsam. A preceptory was a combination of a monastery and a farmstead where knights came to learn to fight as well as to pray.

The Knights Templars were a medieval military order that was formed at the end of the First Crusade to protect Christian pilgrims as they travelled to the Holy Land. The order first came to England in 1128 and reached Yorkshire around 1142. In London the Knights Templars built the Temple Church:

In Yorkshire, the Knights Templars became farmers, generating great wealth which sustained their work in the Holy Land. During excavations at Temple Newsam in 1991, archaeologists found the foundations of a huge barn about 150 feet long. They also found a number of pits. Some may have been for freshwater fish and others had been used for tanning animal skins. There were a variety of land types within the whole area which consisted of woodland, arable land, meadows, pastures and the riverside.

As time passed the Knights Templars became increasingly rich and powerful and their secret rites were shrouded in mystery and intrigue. It was rumoured that they were the guardians of the Holy Grail. In 1307, Philip IV of France decided that they were dangerous. He accused them of heresy and immorality and on Friday, 13th October that year he ordered every member of the Knights Templars in France to be arrested. He called on other countries to do the same, but in England, Edward II refused, saying that the Templars had not broken any laws. But the pope threatened Edward with excommunication and eventually he was forced to obey. In 1308 Sir John Crepping, Sheriff of Yorkshire, received the king’s writ to arrest the Templars within the county and sequester all their property.

Twenty-five men were taken to York Castle where they were charged with heresy, idolatry and other crimes, brought against the order by Pope Clement V and Philip IV of France. After a prolonged trial it was found that the evidence was too flimsy for a conviction. After agreeing that their order was strongly suspected of heresy and other charges, the men, including the last preceptor of Temple Newsam, Geoffrey de Arches, received absolution from the Bishop of Whithern on 29 July 1311 and were released from prison to join various abbeys in the area. Meanwhile, in France, the arrested Templars were burnt at the stake.

As an addition to this post I now have some extra information about Edward II’s treatment of the Templars from a friend who has done a huge amount of research about him.

“Clement, however, threatened Edward with excommunication unless he arrested the Templars in England, so he did so, but a) gave them three weeks’ notice so they had chance to flee, b) paid the ones who were imprisoned their usual wages, c) ordered all his sheriffs to make sure the men were comfortable and properly fed in prison, and d) refused to have them tortured.”

If you want to learn more facts (as opposed to ill informed speculation) about Edward II I can recommend this site:
edwardthesecond.blogspot.com

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

In the Chapter House of Kirkstall Abbey on the 22nd November 1539, the Abbot, John Ripley, and thirty monks one by one signed their name on the surrender deed which read:

“To all the faithful of Christ to whom this present writing shall come, we, John Ripley, abbot of the monastery of Kirkstall in Yorkshire, and the convent of the same place, everlasting greeting in the Lord. Know that we, the aforesaid abbot and convent, by our unanimous assent and consent, with steady minds, of our certain knowledge and proper motion, and certain just and reasonable causes spiritually moving us, our souls and consciences, have freely and of our own accord given and granted, and by these presents we give and grant, surrender, deliver and confirm to the most illustrious and invincible prince, our Lord Henry VIII, by the Grace of God king of England and France, defender of Faith, lord of Ireland and Supreme Head of the Church of England upon earth, our entire house and monastery…”

The abbot then handed over the keys to his abbey to Henry VIII’s commissioners and retired to live in the gatehouse.

In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries the main road to Leeds ran through the nave of the church. The base of the east window was destroyed and where monks had once sung and prayed and where benefactors were buried, travellers walked past or rode on horseback or rolled by in laden carts. Many scratched their initials into the stone pillars as they passed by.

In 1827 the road was redirected, but today the A65 still runs through the grounds of the abbey and you have to negotiate two pelican crossings to walk from the gatehouse to the church.

The base of east window was rebuilt in Victorian times and now a flagged path runs the length of the church for visitors to walk and for groups of schoolchildren to measure the length of the nave with a click wheel. High above jackdaws squawk and drop their feathers (and worse) but in one of the chapels there are still original tiles and if you close your eyes very tightly you may be able to imagine just how Abbot Ripley and his monks felt as they filed out of their church for the very last time.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

It has become commonly accepted that the castle at Clitheroe was built by the second Robert de Lacy in 1186, but there is compelling evidence that it was, in fact, built by the first Robert de Lacy before 1114, which would make it over 70 years older.

The first Robert was the son of Ilbert de Lacy who was given lands that became known as the honour of Pontefract after the Norman conquest of 1066. Robert inherited these from his father and was also given lands in Blackburnshire which included the honour of Clitheroe. He succeeded his father some time between 1091 and 1100.

However Robert was banished from England in 1114 by Henry I (presumably for disputing his right to seize the throne from his elder brother who was away on Crusade) and the de Lacy lands were given to Hugh de Laval. Hugh confirmed a charter that gave income to the Cluniac priory of St John at Pontefract that had been founded by the de Lacys, and in it he refers to the chapel and tithes of his demesne of the castle of Clitheroe: ‘capellam Sci. Michaelis in Castro de Clyderhow’ – the chapel of St Michael in the castle at Clitheroe. This was confirmed by Robert de Lacy on his return.

And as Thomas Dunham Whitaker points out in his history ‘Lords of the Honour of Clitheroe’, it seems unlikely that the land would have been owned for over two generations without a castle being built to administer the estates.

There is also evidence for a much earlier castle being built soon after the conquest when the lands at Clitheroe belonged to Roger de Poitou. In the Domesday Book it is recorded ‘Berenger de Todeni had held XII car. of land in that place, sed modo est in Castellatu Rog. Pictaviensis’. This would seem to indicate that Roger de Poitou had built a castle. It may have been a wooden structure as most of the early Norman castles were. If it was originally wooden then it was replaced by a stone building at a later date. But whether it was replaced by the first Robert de Lacy before 1114 or by the second Robert de Lacy in 1186 remains open to speculation.

The main evidence for the castle being built by Robert de Lacy II comes from a document called Historia Laceiorum. This was written in the 15th century and was printed by Sir William Dugdale in his Monasticon Anglicanum – a history of all the abbeys and other monasteries in England, written in Latin. (Which isn’t helpful as I have to rely on translations). Dugdale linked this document to Kirkstall Abbey though there is no conclusive evidence that it was written there and other historians link it to Whalley Abbey as most of its information is regarding the Lacy lands to the west of the Pennines.

The Historia does contain some known errors. For example Aubrey (or Albreda) Lisours is confused with her daughter of the same name and it misdates the death of Edmund de Lacy. So, although the document credits Robert de Lacy II with the building of the castle at Clitheroe, it could be an error and the writer, working many hundreds of years after the events, could have confused the two Roberts.

Whichever of the two Roberts built the castle they seem to have done a good job. The keep still stands in fairly good repair despite the wear and tear of time and Oliver Cromwell, on whose orders so many castles were pulled down so that they could not be used as strongholds against him. Apart from one gaping hole, blamed on the devil throwing a boulder from Pendle Hill, the remains are currently in good repair and could stand for hundreds of years more.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Norton Priory

September 13, 2010 by elizabethashworth | Edit

I went to do a book signing at Norton Priory yesterday as it has close connections with the story of The de Lacy Inheritance. Part of the novel is set at nearby Halton Castle, the home of the barons of Halton, and it was the second baron, William fitz Nigel who founded the community of Augustinian canons in 1115 on the south bank of the River Mersey, near Runcorn in Cheshire.

It is of special interest to me as this is where Richard, who is one of the main characters in my story, was buried. Priory records record:

‘Iste eciam Rogerus habuit quendam fratrem, Ricardum nomine, cui dedit villam de More; et hic postmodum fuit leprosus, et sepultus est in capitulo canonicorum de Northton.’

This seems to confirm that Roger de Lacy had a brother named Richard who died of leprosy and was buried under the chapter house at Norton. When the priory was excavated a burial was uncovered in the chapter house and the skeleton showed signs of Paget’s disease.

Paget’s disease is a disease of the bones and in days when treatment was impossible it led to deformities and was sometimes confused with leprosy.

Norton Priory: The Archaeology of a Medieval Religious House by J. Patrick Greene says of this burial:

“In a sandstone coffin with an impressively carved lid was the skeleton of a man who had suffered from Paget’s disease.”

It’s clear that this man was someone of importance and records suggest that it probably was Richard.

Here is my photo of the grave site:

And this is a photo that was taken during the archaeological excavations showing the skeleton in situ:

The three smaller coffins contained the remains of children and were the only stone coffins for children that were discovered.

The only other member of the de Lacy family known to have been buried at Norton Priory is Alice, the daughter of Peter de Aquila, who was the first wife of John de Lacy.

* In June 2011 I received a message from Virginia Mylius who told me that Alice was the daughter of Gilbert d’Aquila and his wife Isobel whose first husband was Robert de Lacy.  See the messages below for more information.*

Norton Priory is a very interesting place to visit and apart from the excavated ruins and the well preserved remains of the medieval undercroft you can see the huge 14th century statue of St Christopher. It’s a rare survival of a pre-reformation religious statue. So many were destroyed on the orders of Henry VIII. This one once stood in the courtyard of the house of the Brooke family – a house built after the dissolution of the monasteries. When the Brooke family left the house the statue remained. It was given to Liverpool Museum in 1964 and has since been restored and moved back to the priory where it is displayed in its own purpose built gallery.

The statue is thought to date from around 1391 when the priory was raised in status to an abbey. It is huge, double life size, and traces of paint show that it would originally have been painted in bright colours. It depicts St Christopher carrying the Christ child across a river filled with fish and is an appropriate symbol for a monastery that was close to the river crossing of the Mersey at Runcorn.

If you are in the area do go and see the real thing. It is amazing.

There’s more information here:

http://wapedia.mobi/en/Statue_of_St_Christopher_(Norton_Priory)

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments »

Leighton Hall

August 31, 2010 by elizabethashworth | Edit

I went to visit Leighton Hall, near Carnforth. The hall you see today was rebuilt by George Towneley in the 18th century. It originally had a plain roofline in the Adam style and the ‘turrets’ you can see are a later addition.

The original manor house was destroyed by government troops after the owner Albert Hodgson was taken prisoner at the Battle of Preston during the Jacobite rebellion of 1715. He was imprisoned in Liverpool Castle for 15 years and his estate was forfeit, but when the house was sold by auction in 1723 it was bought by Thomas Winckley of Preston for £1562 who returned it to his friend.

Albert Hodgson had two daughters, Mary and Anne who seem to have lived in what was left of their house. Mary later married George Towneley who was reputed to be the fourth richest man in the country and was one of the Towneleys of Burnley, making him a descendant of two of my characters in The de Lacy Inheritance.

There were no children from their marriage and the hall later passed to members of the Gillow family who were well known in the Lancaster area for their furniture making business. The hall still has many examples of Gillow furniture – and you’re even allowed to sit on the chairs!

Richard and Susan Gillow Reynolds are the current owners of Leighton Hall and open it to the public on summer afternoons. It’s a delightful place to visit and I came away feeling as if I’d spent an afternoon with friends rather than in a stately home.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

I went to watch the final of this joust at Leeds Armouries today. It was brilliant – very competitive – with lots of galloping horses and splintering lances as the competitors jousted for this beautiful trophy.

The winner of the trophy was Graham Turner, perhaps better know for his medieval artwork.

Here’s Graham in the pre-joust parade and in his armour.


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

The Weeping Cross

August 26, 2010 by elizabethashworth | Edit

Yesterday I went to visit the village of Ripley, near Harrogate, in north Yorkshire. The village is dominated by Ripley Castle which has been the home of the Ingilby family for the last 700 years. One of the earliest members of the family, Thomas Ingilby, was knighted by Edward III after saving him from an attack by a wild boar whilst they were out hunting and the boar became the family’s emblem.

In the churchyard of All Saints I came across this unusual medieval cross base which is thought to be the only surviving example of a Weeping Cross in the country. The exact age of the cross in unknown, but it is certainly as old as the church which was built in the 14th century and may have originally been connected with an earlier chapel, known as the Sinking Chapel.

The stones on the top fill what was originally the base for a cross which has been lost. It may originally have been a crucifix and removed at the time of the Reformation. The eight recesses around the base were for kneeling penitents – not perhaps their knees as has sometimes been suggested but more likely for their heads as they knelt on the ground.

The name ‘Weeping Cross’ seems to imply that it was a place of grief, remorse or repentance. It is thought that it may have connections with the festival of Corpus Christi, though public penance for the atonement of sins was fairly common in the middle ages.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

I had an email the other day from someone who is also called Ashworth and is researching his family history. He mentioned some old charters and when I went to check I discovered that Ashworth – which is on the outskirts of Rochdale – was held of the Lord of Middleton and the earliest deed concerning it is a grant made about 1180–90 by Roger, son of Alexander de Middleton, to Geoffrey, son of Robert the Dean of Whalley, of the whole of Ashworth ‘for the service of 40d. yearly for sake fee’. One of the witnesses was a Jordan de Ashworth, who may have been the immediate tenant.

Those of you who have read my novel, The de Lacy Inheritance, will know that Geoffrey de Whalley, the son of the Dean, is a central character and I like the idea that he was the overlord of people who may have been distant ancestors of mine. It seems appropriate that I should be writing about him and bringing the story full circle.

I was also interested in the name Jordan de Ashworth. Jordan seems a modern name but it was in use back then and probably has connections with the Crusades. Crusaders sometimes brought back water from the river Jordan to baptise their children and that could have been the origin of this man’s name.

Another interesting snippet that caught my eye was this: ‘A Robert son of Robert de Ashworth married Tiffany daughter of Margery…’

Jordan and Tiffany. Not what you would expect as medieval names. I can already imagine the snarky comments I’ll receive from Amazon reviewers if my next novel has characters named after a couple of my forebears!

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments »

Out of time

August 4, 2010 by elizabethashworth | Edit

I was in south Yorkshire yesterday taking photographs of graves for my upcoming non-fiction book from Countryside Books – Yorkshire: Who Lies Beneath?

I was around the Rotherham and Doncaster areas and photographed the grave of Lord Nelson’s chaplain, the first black professional footballer, the grave of four children crushed to death in a lorry accident and a teenager who died saving a child from drowning in the river Don. They are all fascinating stories of heroism, history and tragedy.

Towards the end of the afternoon I found myself in Conisbrough and glimpsed the magnificent castle on the hill. So I had to take a look. The castle belonged to the de Warenne family and John de Warenne is one of the characters in my (fictional) work in progress. Sadly, it was too late to go inside, but I will definitely be going back for a closer look.

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments »

July 28, 2010 by elizabethashworth | Edit

I know that many of you are very interested in William Marshall after reading about him in Elizabeth Chadwick’s excellent books The Greatest Knight and The Scarlet Lion.

William was a contemporary of Roger de Lacy so I thought I’d share this story about a time when their paths crossed during the Norman campaign of 1204. This account is taken from the Archaeologia Cambrensis (July 1859, page 195)

“In this year also he (William Marshall) was selected as the man of greatest vigour and capacity in the English court to relieve the gallant Roger de Lacy, besieged for seven months by the French king in Chateau Gaillard, the last hope and hold of the English – Vernueil and Rouen having already fallen. The earl marched to the ground with a body of 3000 horse and 400 foot, but owing to the late arrival of a flotilla of seventy boats, in which he trusted to destroy the floating bridge over the Seine, he was repulsed, the castle shortly afterwards was taken and John (King John) having lost the whole of his Norman possessions, fled to England.”

Chateau Gaillard was built overlooking the river Seine by Richard I (Richard the Lionheart). It had three separate wards and was deemed to be impenetrable. During King John’s attempt to defend his lands in Normandy from the French, the castle was held by Roger de Lacy and for seven months he held out under siege. But his supplies were running low and in an attempt to conserve what food was left Roger expelled all the villagers who had taken shelter in the castle. The French army let some through but then received orders to prevent the rest leaving and many were left to starve or die of cold in the no man’s land between the two camps. This tragedy became known as ‘the useless mouths to feed’.

Meanwhile the French eventually succeeded in mining the outer wall which collapsed and Roger de Lacy was forced to withdraw to the second ward. The one story that’s told about the taking of Chateau Gaillard is that the French eventually got into this ward through an unguarded toilet window that led to the chapel. Some historians dispute this and say that they simply broke into the badly defended chapel that had been added to the original plans by King John.

But got in they did and Roger de Lacy and his men were forced to withdraw to the innermost fortification. This was surrounded by a water moat with a natural rock bridge that crossed it, but the besieging army used the bridge as cover to dig a tunnel that breached the final wall. The inner court was too narrow for the English to mount a defence and overwhelmed by superior numbers Roger de Lacy and his 129 knights were taken prisoner.

It’s said that the French king, Philip Augustus, was so impressed by Roger de Lacy’s heroic defence of the castle that he saved him from being ‘run through’. He was ransomed for 1000 marks, paid by King John, and he returned to England.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

Leprosy, or Hansen’s disease (so named because it was G.H. Armauer Hansen who discovered, in Norway in 1873, that the bacterium Mycobacterium leprae was the cause) has been known to man for over 4000 years. The word leprosy comes from ancient Greek meaning ‘scaly skin’ or ‘scaly back’. Most people are naturally immune to the disease and nowadays it mostly affects people in developing countries where resources are scarce. It is not highly infectious and is probably transmitted through airborn droplets. After infection symptoms can take up to 20 years to develop and begin by affecting the nerves that control feeling in the skin. If left untreated, further nerve damage occurs and ulcers may develop. Because of the loss of sensation, wounds and cuts go unnoticed and the consequent damage leads to the visible signs commonly associated with leprosy.

Leprosy appeared in Europe in the early 11th century and by the 15th century it had all but disappeared. It is thought that the disease may have been brought to Europe from Middle Eastern countries by those who had been on Crusade and it was regarded as being an upper-class disease rather than a disease of the poor. In fact early sufferers were pitied and treated well, but as the prevalence of the disease grew those with leprosy were reviled and seen as unclean and sinful. They were forced to carry a clapper, and later a bell, to warn of their coming so that people could avoid them and not come into close contact with them.

A person with leprosy from a 14th century manuscript. The bell may have been to attract charitable donations as well as warning that a diseased person was in the vicinity.

In the Middle Ages, many skin conditions were labelled as ‘leprosy’. These may have included such conditions as eczema, psoriasis and skin cancers and by the 12th century those with leprosy became regarded as unclean. Around this time many leper houses were built to keep sufferers separate from society as it was believed that the disease was very contagious. The Benedictine monk and chronicler, Matthew Paris, who lived from around 1200 to 1259, estimated that there were 19,000 leper houses in Europe, with 2000 being in France and over a hundred in England. These houses were run along similar lines to monasteries and convents and were for care as well as quarantine. In fact those with leprosy were sometimes viewed as experiencing purgatory whilst still on earth and their suffering was viewed as holy. The residents spent much time in prayer and, as it was also popularly thought to have been a sexually transmitted disease, the leper houses made the sufferers take a vow of chastity.

Those who did not enter leper houses took the vows that are listed in the Mass of Separation including vowing not to enter any church or marketplace and not to touch the rim or rope of a well except with gloved hands. They were also excluded from inheriting.

Famous sufferers include Baldwin IV, king of Jerusalem, who continued to rule despite his illness and Alice the Leper, a Cistercian nun who became a leprous martyr. There is also, of course, Richard FitzEustace, in my novel The de Lacy Inheritance, who is based on a real person.

Many wealthy people in the middle ages gave donations to the leper houses and Roger de Lacy (who was Richard’s brother) gave land for a leper hospital on the banks of the river Ribble near Clitheroe. The site is now the Edisford Hotel near the bridge that spans the river. The hospital was named St Nicholas’s.

Nowadays leprosy is curable with treatment by a multidrug therapy that combines dapsone, clofazimine and rifampicin. However the disease remains in parts of Africa, Asia and South America and there are still occasional cases of leprosy treated in the UK.

I have also been told by Sian Arulanantham, Head of Programmes at The Leprosy Mission, that legislation still exists that discriminates against people affected by leprosy. This is just one of the issues that The Leprosy Mission is trying to address. You can find out more about their work at: http://www.leprosymission.org.uk/

Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments »

I was at Whalley Abbey today and the Cloisters Cafe was in temporary accommodation within the main house. The door I went in was almost underneath the main steps to the conference centre and when I glanced up I saw some carvings that I had never noticed before.

Looking more closely I saw that the emblems on the shields which hang on either side of the carved head are clearly linked with the de Lacy family. To the left is a griffin and to the right the de Lacy fret, or knot.

Although the usual arms of de Lacy is the rampant purple lion on a yellow background, Roger de Lacy used a seal that depicted a griffin being stung by a serpent and it has been suggested that this was a representation of his subjugation of the Welsh. Whether the face in the centre of the shields is a random one or if this is a representation of Roger de Lacy is open to conjecture.

 Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

July 4, 2010 by elizabethashworth | Edit

Stories of the legendary outlaw Robin Hood have been told and retold for hundreds of years. The earliest versions would have been told by travelling minstrels and the earliest written version was an old ballad named A Lytell Geste of Robyn Hode that was printed in about 1500. From verbal stories to written versions the stories have since moved to television and film and show no sign of falling from favour, as was demonstrated by the number of people who joined a series of guided walks today to visit Robin Hood’s grave.

According to the legend, Robin Hood died at Kirklees Priory in Yorkshire where he had gone to be cared for by the prioress who was his cousin. As he lay dying he summoned his faithful friend, Little John, by blowing his hunting horn. He then shot an arrow from the window and asked to be buried where it landed.

Most of Kirklees Priory has disappeared – at least in its original form – and the site is now a field on the Kirklees Estate. The wall that can be seen on the far side of the field is the original nunnery wall.

All that remains of the Cistercian nunnery that was founded in 1155 is this gatehouse. It is from here that Robin supposedly shot his arrow.

It is thought that this building was used as a residence for the farm manager when the rest of the priory was demolished and the stones used to construct farm buildings like this one.

And to build Kirklees Hall, home to the Armytage family from 1565 until the 1980s.

Around 660 yards from the gatehouse is the grave of Robin Hood. The original stone slab was surrounded by a wall and then railings to prevent it being damaged after a belief arose that a chip of stone from the grave would cure toothache.

Surrounded by the yew trees which provided the wood for English longbows, one of the most famous archers in our history lies at peace in the Greenwood.

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments »

June 20, 2010 by elizabethashworth | Edit

I visit a lot of old churches and most of them have plain white walls. But they weren’t always like that. Before Henry VIII’s reformation the walls of the churches were painted with scenes from biblical stories and the lives of the saints. They were bright, colourful, informative and entertaining. In fact wall paintings have been called the Bibila Pauperum – the poor man’s bible. In the days when many could people could not read, never mind afford to own something as expensive as a book, these paintings were used to educate and remind people about their faith.

Sometimes you find churches that have some vestiges of wall paintings such as St Wilfrid’s in Ribchester, Lancashire, but the best example I’ve seen is at the church of St Peter and St Paul at Pickering in north Yorkshire. When I walked in I was overwhelmed by the extent and the condition of the paintings.

These paintings were commissioned around 1450 and painted over the next decade. Yet within a hundred years they had been covered and weren’t rediscovered until 1852 when a thick coat of plaster was removed from the walls of the nave. Many people came to see them, but they were subsequently whitewashed over as the vicar at the time, the Reverend F. Ponsonby, thought that they were a distraction from his sermons and ‘full of Popish superstitions’.

However a later vicar, the Reverend G.H. Lightfoot, agreed that the paintings should be restored during renovations in 1876.

Many of the paintings show the lives of saints:

A lot of them are fairly graphic too. If you study the one above you will see Catherine stripped to the waist and being flogged. Below we have the beheading of John the Baptist:

And here is St Edmund – stripped, tied to a tree and shot with arrows. He was later beheaded:

Perhaps all these scenes of martyrdom helped people come to terms with the closeness of death in those times. Death from disease, in childbirth and in battle was common and people may have taken comfort from the stories of those who had also suffered but who had found their place in heaven. There is also a graphic picture that warns what will happen to those who descend into the jaws of hell. So the pictures also served as a warning to live a good life.

It’s sad that so many other examples have been lost, but I was thrilled to see this one. Do go and have a look for yourself if you’re ever in the area. The real thing is much better than my photos.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

June 13, 2010 by elizabethashworth | Edit

It was pouring with rain, but this huge standing stone, thought to be the tallest in Britain, was something I was determined to see for myself.

Standing around 26 feet above the ground and an uncertain but considerable depth below, this stone was brought to the site where it now stands in the churchyard of All Saints Church at Rudston in East Yorkshire during the late neolithic period, possibly as long ago as 2000 BC.

The stone itself is a rough conglomerate moor grit and could have been brought from the Cleveland Hills. How this was achieved, given that it was transported before the invention of the wheel, is open to speculation though it could have been floated downriver on a substantial raft and then dragged up the hill to its final location.

It would have had some sort of religious significance as it seems certain that the Christian church was built on the same site as an earlier place of pagan worship. During excavations in the late 1700s by Sir William Strickland found many skulls nearby and there is speculation that this could have been a sacrificial site.

Christianity came to Rudston in 615 AD. Edwin who was the chief of the Celtic tribe of Parisii had been given permission to marry Ethelburga if he and his Yorkshire tribe embraced the new religion of Christianity. After discussion the Elders and the priest of the tribe agreed and hundreds of people were baptised in the cold waters of the river Derwent at Yedingham. Better than being killed as an offering to the pagan gods!

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments »

It’s strange to stand in an almost silent shell of an old church and think that once it was at the centre of a thriving community. Today I walked to Wharram Percy in Yorkshire. There had been a settlement there since the first milennium BC and a village since the 10th century AD. It was a thriving place in the 12th to 14th centuries, despite losses of population in the Black Death. But later when much of the pasture was enclosed for sheep farming most of the families moved away and the last four families were evicted between 1488 and 1506.

The shell of the church of St Martin still remains – filled with birdsong rather than prayer, and today with the scent of hawthorn rather than incense. Beautiful in its setting and slightly romantic, yet sad to be deserted.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

May is out

May 28, 2010 by elizabethashworth | Edit

The hawthorn tree at the bottom of my garden has burst into bloom, just a few days before the end of the month of May. So I’m hoping that I can safely ‘cast my clouts’.

Although it looks very pretty the scent is powerful and after a while becomes slightly unpleasant as it has a whiff of decomposition. The reason is probably that the flowers are fertilised mainly by carrion insects who would normally lay their eggs in rotting flesh, and the tree has acquired that smell to attract them. Rural villagers in the middle ages thought that it held the smell of the Great Plague of London.

There are many myths and legends associated with the hawthorn. Because it flowers in the Spring it is associated with fertility. But if you place its leaves under a pillow or scatter them around a bedroom it will enforce or maintain chastity and celibacy.

Hawthorn is associated with both good and bad luck. A branch of hawthorn over your door will ward off evil spirits. Hawthorn will also protect you from lightning and protect your house from damage by storms. But do not bring the flowers into the house or someone who lives there will die. If it is worn, or carried, it will promote happiness in the troubled, sad or depressed. Fishermen should also carry some hawthorn to ensure a good catch.

At one time hawthorns were thought to be witches who had transformed themselves into trees. It was believed that witches danced and performed rites under the hawthorn and that they used the branches to make their broomsticks.

It is also associated with fairies, especially in Ireland. The hawthorn is sacred to fairies and is part of the fairy tree triad of oak, ash and thorn. Where all three trees grow together it is said that you may see fairies. But bad luck will follow if you dare to disturb a ‘fairy thorn’. In 1982, workers in the De Lorean car plant in Northern Ireland claimed that the business had so many problems because a ‘fairy thorn’ had been disturbed during the construction of the plant. Apparently this claim was taken so seriously that a new one was planted.

On a Hawthorn Tree

“Oh! come to see me, when the soft warm May
Bids all my boughs their gay embroidery wear,
In my bright season’s transitory day,
While my young perfume loads the enamoured air.”

George W.F. Howard
Earl of Carlisle 1802-1864

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

I came across this at a local farm shop this afternoon. It is drawn from a well, known as King Henry’s Well where the Lancastrian king is said to have divined water during his time in hiding at Bolton Hall in Bolton-by-Bowland.

As Henry was known for his fits of madness I’m not entirely sure whether to drink it – although he was unable to rule because of his mental health problems for many years before his discovery of this water source.

It’s thought that he suffered from some sort of catatonic schizophrenia, similar to the episodes of madness that affected his grandfather, Charles VI of France, who on occasions was convinced that he was made of glass and would shatter if he sat down.

Henry VI was king from 1421 to 1461, and again for fewer than six months during 1470/71 when he was placed back on the throne by the Earl of Warwick (the king maker) following his rebellion against Edward IV.

During the times Henry was unable to rule, the country was governed by Richard, Duke of York, as Protector of the Realm and in 1460 parliament agreed that after the death of Henry the crown would pass to the Duke of York and his heirs. But Henry’s queen, Margaret of Anjou was not prepared to allow her son, Edward, to be disinherited and with her supporter, the Earl of Somerset she opposed York and his sons.

A few weeks later York was dead after the Battle of Wakefield and the Wars of the Roses had begun in earnest. After Lancastrian defeats at Towton and Hexham the Duke of York’s eldest son became King Edward IV and Henry fled and spent years hiding out in Lancashire. He lived at Bolton Hall with the Pudsay family for some time before being moved to Waddington Hall. He was discovered here in 1464 and despite escaping was taken prisoner as he crossed the River Ribble and was taken to London where he was kept in the Tower until his readeption in 1470.

His reign did not last long. Warwick and the Lancastrians were beaten at the Battle of Tewkesbury. Henry’s son was killed and Henry himself died at the Tower of London very soon afterwards in circumstances that are unclear.

Poor Henry. He was never much of a king and that wasn’t really his fault. He was a sick and damaged man and it’s a shame he couldn’t have lived out his life in obscurity in Lancashire, divining water and digging wells. Perhaps I will drink a toast to him after all.

April 20, 2010 by elizabethashworth | Edit

I went to visit Shibden Hall at Halifax today. It’s probably best known as the home of Anne Lister and as there’s a BBC drama about her life due to air this spring I thought I’d better go before the rush.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/tv/comingup/the-secret-diaries-of-miss-anne-lister/

The hall was originally built in 1420 by William Oates and was a medieval timber framed manor house. It’s changed since then, but the guide showed me some glimpses of the original house that can still be seen behind the later panelling – a huge oak beam supporting what was the original entrance, painted wooden panels in what is now the dining room and a huge fireplace hidden behind a smaller more modern one.

The hall passed to the Savile family and then the Waterhouses before being owned by the Listers for around 300 years. Anne Lister was responsible for the extensive alterations to the hall in the 19th century and also much of the landscaping in the garden which is now a very attractive park.

As it’s only an hour’s drive from where I live I can’t understand why I’ve only just discovered it. I think it will definitely merit a second visit.

Posted in 1 | Leave a Comment »

Kirkstall Abbey

April 12, 2010 by elizabethashworth | Edit

There’s a scene in my novel The de Lacy Inheritance where Richard stands outside the doors of the church at Kirkstall Abbey but is not allowed to go inside. I took part in a small re-enaction of that scene today when I went to visit Kirkstall but discovered that the remains are closed on Mondays.

Although it was disappointing it was possible to see much of the abbey by walking around the outside of the railings, and by putting my hands through the bars I was able to get a fairly good selection of photos.

When Henry de Lacy fell ill he vowed that if he recovered he would found a religious house. When he was well he helped monks from Fountains Abbey to found a new abbey at Barnoldswick, but the site proved unsuitable. On 19th May 1152 the monks came to the new site at Kirkstall. The land had belonged to William Peitevin, who held it of Henry de Lacy, but it is Henry who is recorded in the foundation history as being the driving force behind William’s grant of this land to the monks.

Kirkstall Abbey is one of the most complete examples of a medieval Cistercian abbey in Britain. As all Cistercian abbeys are built to a similar floorplan it is comparable with Fountains Abbey as well as Byland Abbey and Whalley Abbey amongst others.

The other attraction of Kirkstall is that it is free to visit (as long as you don’t go on a Monday or a Friday) so I will definitely be going back when it is open to have a better look!

Posted in 1 | Leave a Comment »

During my research into the life of Henry de Lacy, Earl of Lincoln, I discovered that when he granted the monks of Stanlaw Abbey (founded by his great, great grandfather John around 1172) permission to move to Whalley one of the conditions that he stipulated was that the remains of his ancestors should be taken from Stanlaw and reburied in the new Abbey church at Whalley.

The move was quite a long time coming as the monks were unable to move until after the death of Peter de Cestria in 1296. There were other problems and it was not until 1306 that the ground was consecrated and in 1308 Henry de Lacy himself laid the foundation stone of the church.

The church was not completed until around 1380 by which time both Henry and his daughter Alice, the last surviving legitimate member of the de Lacy family, were both dead. There is no record of the remains of the de Lacy ancestors being reburied in the church, but as Geoffrey Ainsworth Williams says in his history of the abbey Locus Benedictus (the blessed place) “the monks were nor unmindful of how much they owed to the Earl of Lincoln and his family, and in the medieval period great importance was attached to the preservation of relics and the veneration of tombs of ancestors.”

This afternoon I was wandering amongst the ruins of the abbey when I noticed the remains of a huge stone slab, which looked as if it was a tombstone, within what was once the abbey church. It clearly bears the arms of the de Lacy family -the rampant lion.

The shield is etched to the left of what looks like a cross and it seems reasonable to surmise that another shield, possibly that of the Barons of Halton, was on the right hand side. If this is indeed a stone that marks a grave then is it possible that this is where the remains of Henry de Lacy’s ancestors lie?

Posted in 1 | Leave a Comment »

March 27, 2010 by elizabethashworth | Edit

I was in York last Monday afternoon. It was a showery day and around four o’clock there was a sudden downpour that sent everyone dashing for shelter. From the doorway of the art gallery I turned as the sun came out and looking up at the cloud dark sky I was rewarded with a vivid rainbow which appeared to come down onto the Minster.

Rainbows make me think of a variety of things. Beauty. A sense of wonder. A reminder that we are living on a sphere which turns in space. God’s promise after the flood. And the rhyme I was taught so many years ago to help remember the colours. Richard Of York Gave Battle In Vain. Red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo and violet.

Richard of York was a descendant of Edward III and after he had acted as Protector during the mental illness of Henry VI he pressed his superior claim to the throne. On 7th October 1460 parliament agreed that the crown should pass to York and his heirs after the death of Henry VI. But Henry’s wife, Margaret of Anjou, and her supporters were unhappy with this decision and raised an army to defeat the Duke of York by force. This was the beginning of what are now called the Wars of the Roses.

Facing uprisings by the Lancastrians, Richard of York sent his eldest son, Edward, the Earl of March, to put down a rebellion in Wales and he marched north to Sandal Castle, in Yorkshire, with his second son, Edmund, the Earl of Rutland.

No-one is sure why he left the castle on 30th December 1460, but the result was the Battle of Wakefield where he was hacked to death by his enemies and his seventeen year old son was murdered as he tried to escape the carnage. Both their heads were left to rot on Micklegate Bar in York following the Lancastrian victory.

So the rainbow over the Minster left me with feelings of both delight and sadness as I considered some of the history connected with the city and the dynasty of York.

Posted in 1 | Leave a Comment »

Mothering Sunday

March 14, 2010 by elizabethashworth | Edit

Today is Mothering Sunday. It is a Christian festival which falls on the fourth Sunday in Lent and celebrates ‘mother church’. On this day people would return to worship at their mother church which was often a cathedral or large parish church. It was the place they had been baptised and where their family came from so it would also have been a day for family reunions. It was this that became the tradition of allowing servants to go to their family homes on this Sunday to visit their mothers and it was this that led to it becoming a celebration of motherhood as well. There was also a slight relaxation of the Lenten fast and traditionally Simnel cake was eaten on this day which is why it is also sometimes known as Simnel Sunday.

Posted in 1 | Leave a Comment »

Another grave

March 12, 2010 by elizabethashworth | Edit

Here’s another interesting grave that I didn’t have room to include in my bookLancashire: Who Lies Beneath?

It is not the actual grave but the gravestone of Peter de Cestria, the first and only Rector of Whalley. It previously lay in the churchyard but was brought inside in 1950 to preserve it.

Peter de Cestria was an interesting man and a member, though not a legitimate one, of the de Lacy family. He was never actually a priest but rose to become a very influential man in the reign of King Edward I.

Although the remains of Whalley Abbey contain his chapel, that building pre-dates the abbey and Peter was set against the monks making the move from Stanlaw. They were only able to come after his death, eleven years after they had been promised the site by Henry de Lacy.

I’ve written more about Peter de Cestria on my page about the de Lacy family.

Posted in 1 | Leave a Comment »

I went to Lyme Park in Cheshire today to see the exhibition ‘Charles I: King and Martyr’. Lyme Park has a set of chairs reputedly upholstered with the silk lining of the cloak in which Charles went to his execution. Also on display were a pair of the king’s gloves, his dagger and his eating knife as well as selection of images of him and his execution. It was fascinating but slightly chilling.

On the 30th January 1649, after reigning for almost 24 years, Charles went to his execution on a scaffold outside his palace of Whitehall in London having been found guilty of high treason.

He had ruled as an absolute monarch believing that he had a divine right to be king and had no need of parliament. His attitude had led to a civil war and even when defeated he refused to accept demands for a constitutional monarchy. At his trial he wore a hat throughout the proceedings to show that he did acknowledge the court’s authority and when he was found guilty he went to his death as a martyr. His final words were that he went ‘from a corruptible to an incorruptible crown’.

Following his death many people struggled with their guilt at the killing of an anointed king and a cult of sainthood grew up around him. Many of the pictures in the exhibition draw parallels between the execution of Charles and the death of Jesus.

Charles severed head was sewn back onto his body before it was taken for private burial at St George’s chapel, Windsor.

Posted in 1 | Leave a Comment »

Clitheroe Castle

February 14, 2010 by elizabethashworth | Edit

I went to Clitheroe Castle this afternoon. It’s been on my mind since I spent last weekend giving The de Lacy Inheritance a final edit.

There’s been a castle on the site since shortly after the Norman Conquest. The original would have been a timber structure and this stone keep was built around 1187 by Robert de Lacy, so at the time my novel is set it was only a few years old. Much of the story is set in and around the castle and in the photo below you can clearly see that it is built on an outcrop of limestone.

The small keep originally stood within a protective curtain wall with a gatehouse to the eastern side and within the bailey there were other buildings (possibly wooden) including the chapel of St Michael. Sadly no trace of these remain.

There are a couple of stories that account for the hole in the side of the keep. One says that the devil through a rock from Pendle Hill. The other says it was made by Cromwell’s army so that the castle couldn’t be used as a stronghold against them.

The site has recently undergone some redevelopment and now has a new and very interesting museum that has a range of exhibits about the history of the area as well as the castle.

Posted in 1 | Leave a Comment »

One Response to Articles from my previous blog

  1. Frank Speechley says:

    I have just recently commenced searching my family tree. My grandmother was born a de Lacey, She had a brother Count Francis De lacey, after whom my father & I were named. He died in June 1950. He did not have any family himself, his sister married David Speechley and had 4 children. We have been told that Speechley’s originated in Normandy, France and were involved with the de Lacey’s at the time of the battle of Hastings. And now we find that they have married into the de Laceys. It certainly is a strange & complicated world. I would love to study your books as they sound very, very interesting. I do not know which line Francis came down as there are a number associated with various European families. He was the last one to hold the title “Count” in Australia.. I intend to source out your books, and would like to have contact with you again in the future.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s